180 research outputs found
Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization
Developing a new specializationâIntegration and Implementation Sciencesâmay be an effective way to draw together and significantly strengthen the theory and methods necessary to tackle complex societal issues and problems. This paper presents an argument for such a specialization, beginning with a brief review of calls for new research approaches that combine disciplines and interact more closely with policy and practice. It posits that the core elements of Integration and Implementation Sciences already exist, but that the field is currently characterized by fragmentation and marginalization. The paper then outlines three sets of characteristics that will delineate Integration and Implementation Sciences. First is that the specialization will aim to find better ways to deal with the defining elements of many current societal issues and problems: namely complexity, uncertainty, change, and imperfection. Second is that there will be three theoretical and methodological pillars for doing this: 1) systems thinking and complexity science, 2) participatory methods, and 3) knowledge management, exchange, and implementation. Third, operationally, Integration and Implementation Sciences will be grounded in practical application, and generally involve large-scale collaboration. The paper concludes by examining where Integration and Implementation Sciences would sit in universities, and outlines a program for further development of the field. An appendix provides examples of Integration and Implementation Sciences in action
Measuring the Global Research Environment: Information Science Challenges for the 21st Century
âWhat does the global research environment look like?â This paper presents a summary look at the results of efforts to
address this question using available indicators on global research production. It was surprising how little information is available, how difficult some of it is to access and how flawed the data are. The three most useful data sources were UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Research and Development data (1996-2002), the Institute of Scientific Information publications listings for January 1998 through March 2003, and the World of Learning 2002 reference volume. The data showed that it is difficult to easily get a good overview of the global research situation from existing sources. Furthermore, inequalities between countries in research capacity are marked and challenging. Information science offers strategies for responding to both of these challenges. In both cases improvements are likely if access to information can be facilitated and the process of integrating information from different sources can be simplified, allowing transformation into effective action. The global research environment thus serves as a case study for the focus of this paper â the exploration of information science responses to challenges in the management, exchange and implementation of knowledge globally
Moving interdisciplinary research forward: Top down organising force needed to help classify diverse practices
What does âinterdisciplinarityâ actually mean? Gabriele Bammer argues lumping interdisciplinary work together may be prohibiting an effective evaluation of how this kind of research is faring. A much more intuitive approach is needed to distinguishing between aspects of diverse research practices. Furthermore, developing effective professional organisations is also a key task for moving interdisciplinary research forward
Why are interdisciplinary research proposals less likely to be funded? Lack of adequate peer review may be a factor.
Recent findings suggest interdisciplinary research is less likely to be funded than discipline-based research proposals. Gabriele Bammer looks at how interdisciplinary research is currently peer reviewed and argues different review processes may well be required to do justice to these different kinds of interdisciplinarity. Discipline-based researchers may be ill-equipped to evaluate the integrative processes that an interdisciplinary proposal plans to use
Feasibility Research into the Controlled Availability of Opioids (Stage 1)
Illegal drug use is a problem worldwide. Prisons are overcrowded with people whose criminal activity is related to illegal drug use and/or distribution. Yet illegal drug use apparently goes unchecked.
Addiction to opioids is no recent phenomenon. The opium trade is centuries old. The question is increasingly being asked whether the costs of current social and legal policies concerning opioid use outweigh their benefits. Urgency has been given to the issue by the advent of the human immunodeficiency virus and its wildfire spread through shared use of injecting equipment in some drug using communities. Opioid use has become synonymous with criminal activity, 'chaotic lifestyles' and living
dangerously.The present report covers stage 1 (feasibility). It has been prepared at NCEPH by Dr
Gabriele Bammer who has co-ordinated a multi-disciplinary team drawn both from
within and outside the Centre. Our collaboration with the Australian Institute of
Criminology on this exercise has been particularly important, and the process has been
monitored and modified by an advisory committee and informed by a large reference
group of experts, both in Australia and overseas. Responsibility for the report and its
recommendations rests with me and the authors. We have carefully considered the
advice of all members of the advisory committee and the suggestions of the reference
group. Not all of the recommendations in the report are necessarily endorsed by all
individuals in either group. The two volume report is being submitted to Mr Mooreâs
committee and being widely disseminated in the ACT community and beyond, to
inform and provoke discussion about whether or not to proceed to Stage 2.
The report offers our advice that an ACT trial of controlled availability of opioids is
feasible. It argues that such a trial would need to be very carefully structured as a
randomised control trial which can provide answers to specific questions. These
answers do not exist anywhere in the world at this time. We recognise that there are
many uncertainties associated with undertaking such a trial, but conclude that there is
a sound basis for proceeding to a Stage 2 feasibility study
Report and Recommendations of Stage 2 Feasibility Research into the Controlled Availability of Opioids
This report is the culmination of four years of research into the
question: Should a carefully controlled and rigorously evaluated
trial be conducted to determine whether or not the prescription of
pharmaceutical heroin (diacetylmorphine) is a useful addition to
current maintenance treatment for dependent heroin users?
It recommends that two carefully controlled pilot studies
should be conducted in Canberra. However, the addition of
diacetylmorphine to maintenance treatment must not be linked with
permissive attitudes to illicit drug use and must be coupled with
continuing law enforcement and prevention activity against illicit
drug use
Key issues in co-creation with stakeholders when research problems are complex
The extensive literature on research co-creation is mostly based on problems being treated as clearly defined and solvable. What is the impact on co-creation when problems are complex, with the following characteristics: difficult to delimit, contested definitions, multiple uncertainties and unresolvable unknowns, constraints on what can be done, and no perfect solution?Through the Theme âBuilding Resources for Complex, Action-Oriented Team
Scienceâ and the âCo-Creative Capacityâ pursuit, this work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding received
from the National Science Foundation DBI-1052875
Strengthening community operational research through exchange of tools and strategic alliances
Community operational research (COR) would benefit from forming strategic alliances with other areas of scholarly endeavor involved in tackling complex social and environmental problems. Intellectually this would strengthen COR as a community of practice, expanding its repertoire of tools and increasing uptake of COR concepts and methods by researchers outside COR. Banding together would also increase influence in research and higher education policy making to promote widespread uptake of the best ways of tackling complex problems and ensuring there is adequate funding and institutional support. A new discipline of Integration and Implementation Sciences (I2S), which aims to be a conduit between COR and others tackling complex social and environmental issues, is described, along with its origins. The role of I2S as a conduit is illustrated by presenting six tools and toolkits, which have been developed outside COR, but which may enhance its practice. They are: (1) knowledge co-production toolbox, (2) change management toolbook, (3) collaboration and team science field guide, (4) engaging and influencing policy toolkit, (5) ethical matrix and (6) matrix for distinguishing three different kinds of unknowns
Recognising interdisciplinary expertise: is it time we established the integration and implementation sciences?
Embedding interdisciplinarity into the academic mainstream has proved a constant challenge. Gabriele Bammer asks whether it might help to define the relevant expertise as a new discipline, one that recognises important skills such as the ability to combine knowledge from different disciplines, determine which disciplines and stakeholders have valuable perspectives, examine how elements of problems are interconnected, assess the likely consequences of critical unknowns, and use research to support evidence-based change. Integration and implementation sciences (I2S) would codify such knowledge and skills, proving especially valuable to teams tackling complex societal and environmental problems
Knowing that and knowing how â applying expertise to complex problems
Expertise is often understood in disciplinary terms, as the mastery of knowledge within a particular field of study. In this repost, Gabriele Bammer argues for the particular nature of expertise in research integration and implementation and suggests how this form of expertise is key to addressing the complex challenges currently facing society
- âŠ